Joss Whedon as Shakespearean Moralist
Narrative Ethics of the Bard and the Buffyverse
$29.95
In stock
About the Book
Drawing on the works of Shakespeare and American screenwriter Joss Whedon, this study in narrative ethics contends that Whedon is the Shakespeare of our time. The Bard wrote before the influence of the modern moral philosophers, while Whedon is writing in the postmodern period. It is argued that Whedon’s work is more in harmony with the early modern values of Shakespeare than with modern ethics, which trace their origin to 17th and 18th century moral philosophy. This study includes a detailed discussion of representative works of Shakespeare and Whedon, showing how they can and should be read as forms of narrative ethics.
About the Author(s)
Bibliographic Details
J. Douglas Rabb and J. Michael Richardson
Format: softcover (6 x 9)
Pages: 224
Bibliographic Info: bibliography, index
Copyright Date: 2015
pISBN: 978-0-7864-7440-0
eISBN: 978-1-4766-1786-2
Imprint: McFarland
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments v
Foreword by Kim Fedderson 1
Introduction 5
One—Joss Whedon, the Shakespeare for Our Time 11
Two—Shakespeare’s Brain and Whedon’s Brains: Cognitive Theory in Narrative and Ethics 28
Three—Joss Whedon’s “Big Brain”: The Espenson Authorship Controversy 55
Four—Shakespeare and Popular Culture: Uses and Echos of the Bard in the Whedonverses and Ours as Well 83
Five—Persons, Personation and Character Development: The Transformative Nature of Narrative 102
Six—The Moral Imagination in Shakespeare: Pre-Modern and Early Modern Ethics 127
Seven—The Moral Imagination in Whedon: Post-Modern and Post-Christian Love Ethics 147
Eight—Reason and Rules in Ethics: The Parfit Pathology 162
Conclusion: Narrative Ethics in Action 178
Works Cited 201
Index 213
Book Reviews & Awards
“This book makes a compelling argument that Joss Whedon…is the Shakespeare of our time. They consider representative works from each author and draw important parallels through the narrative ethics. Fans of Whedon and literary scholars will both find this book an informative and interesting read”—ProtoView.